next up previous
Next: Uncertainties Up: Composition and Photodissociative Flux Previous: NASA ER-2 Campaigns

   
The CPFM Spectroradiometer

This section is based in large part on two publications, McElroy (1995) and McElroy et al. (1995), which describe the CPFM instrument, calibration, errors, and data analysis.

The CPFM instrument is a small, light-weight photodiode array spectrometer. It measures the solar flux on a horizontal surface, the vertical and horizontal polarized limb radiance components, and the along-track and cross-track polarized nadir radiance components. The limb observations consist of a ten-point scan. The detector is an EG&G 1024-element, photodiode array and is positioned at the focus of an f/2 concave, holographic diffraction grating. Filters are used to allow only light in either the first order, 375-775 nm, or the second order, 188-388 nm, to be focused onto the array. In addition, polarizers are used to select one polarization component of the limb or nadir radiance and reject the other. Due to the increased absorption by ozone combined with declining UV sensitivity there are no useful data below 300 nm. The layout of the CPFM spectroradiometer is shown in Figure 3.3. The CPFM instrument is installed in the ER-2 wing pod at the rear of the right wing, as shown in Figures 3.1 and 3.4.


  \begin{figure}% latex2html id marker 2145
\centering\leavevmode
\psfig{file=/hom...
...]
{Optical arrangement of CPFM spectroradiometer (McElroy, 1995).}
\end{figure}


  \begin{figure}% latex2html id marker 2150
\centering\leavevmode
\psfig{file=/hom...
...tion of the CPFM instrument in the ER-2 wing pod
(McElroy, 1995).}
\end{figure}

The calibration for the absolute radiometry of the direct-viewing ports (limb and nadir fields) and the horizontal diffuser is carried out using a quartz-halogen lamp. The lamp calibration is accurate to 2% between 300 and 800 nm. Absolute radiance and irradiance were determined by scaling the measured signals by the signals observed when viewing the calibrated sources. The calibration process was carried out on-site as often as possible, including before the first flight and after the last. Wavelength calibration is done using emission lines from mercury and neon lamps. Each element of the array detector is associated with a wavelength using a cubic dispersion equation. Corrections are made post flight to account for wavelengths shifts caused by variation in pressure and temperature. The wavelength assignments are accurate to about 0.05 nm. Over the course of a flight, selected Neon and Fraunhoffer lines were observed to stray by a maximum of 0.1 nm. Stray light, or internally scattered light, becomes significant at wavelength less than 310 nm, contributing about 60% of the signal at 300 nm. Stray light is corrected for by subtracting off the signal between 290 and 295 nm, wavelengths at which there is no real light signal.

A single cycle of measurements consists of one complete spectrum (first and second order) for each of the five fields. The measurement sequence is horizontal flux, nadir (both polarizations) and limb (both polarizations). There is a 40-second delay while switching between the diffuser and nadir fields and a 30-second delay between the nadir and limb and between the limb and diffuser. The integration time used varied from 0.1 to 4 seconds.

The horizontal flux is measured by a transmitting diffuser which approximates the performance of a cosine collector. The angle between the diffuser normal and sun (called the relative zenith angle) is measured and it is used to cosine correct the measured flux. Due to the surface properties of the diffuser, there is a departure from true cosine behaviour and an additional correction must be used. For small relative zenith angles this factor is small, about 2%, but increases to 20% at 85$^{\circ }$. For wavelengths greater than 500 nm, this correction factor is also wavelength-dependent.

The nadir and limb fields have a field of view of 0.1$^{\circ }$ by 10$^{\circ }$. In the nadir, with the ER-2 at 20 km, this results in an observed surface area of 0.035 km $\times$ 3.5 km or approximately 0.1 km2. Switching between fields, as well as the different angles in a limb scan, is accomplished by rotating a 45$^{\circ }$ prism using a small motor. To describe the look angle of the limb-viewing port, the elevation angle is introduced. The elevation angle, EA, describes the angle above (positive) or below (negative) the local horizon. For any step in a scan, the elevation angle, EA, is given by the following formula5.1,

\begin{displaymath}{\rm EA} = 4.1^{\circ} - 1.5^{\circ}\cos (10^{\circ}) \cdot {\rm STEP} - {\rm ROLL}
\end{displaymath} (5.1)

where STEP refers to the position number of the mirror (0 through 9) and ROLL is the roll of the aircraft, with positive roll being when the right wing is down. Thus the first step in the scan is usually 3-6$^{\circ }$ above the local horizon and the last is 7-10$^{\circ }$ below the local horizon. With the ER-2 at 20 km, the surface becomes visible at an EA of about $-4.5^{\circ}$ so the last two or three steps in the scan may have a significant direct surface reflected component, depending on wavelength. A single limb scan takes approximately 20 minutes. With the ER-2 cruising at 210 m/s, a distance of about 300 km is covered.

The data used in this study will have passed through a number of processing steps. They are summarized below.

1.
Raw data are corrected for dark current and stray light.
2.
Spectra are converted into physical units using calibration lamp data.
3.
UV and visible data are filtered, blended, and interpolated onto a 0.5 nm grid.
4.
Direct beam irradiance determined by applying cosine correction.
For retrieval of trace gas profiles, which is based on the fine absorption structure, data from step 2 are used directly. At this level, the spectra are oversampled as they are on a 0.2 nm grid in the UV and a 0.4 nm grid in the visible.


  \begin{figure}% latex2html id marker 2173
\centering\leavevmode
\psfig{file=/hom...
...mbers
refer to segments of the linear fit given by equation (3.2).}
\end{figure}

The slit function of the CPFM has been characterized by first finding the peak intensity, normalizing to it, and determining $-\log(-\log I_{\rm norm})$. This function has three distinct regions, each of which is well approximated by a linear fit. The slit function for the different regions are (C.T. McElroy, personal communication, 1998),

 \begin{displaymath}y = \left\{ \begin{array}{lcrclcc}
0.00456p + 0.1560 && -34.3...
...1 && 15.496 & \leq p \leq & 35.691 && [6]
\end{array} \right.
\end{displaymath} (5.2)

where p is pixel number. The numbers on the right correspond to the segments of the $-\log(-\log I_{\rm norm})$ slit function transform shown in Figure 3.5. Sections 3 and 4 represent the central peak, 2 and 5 the shoulder of the slit function, and 1 and 6 are the stray light regions.



 
next up previous
Next: Uncertainties Up: Composition and Photodissociative Flux Previous: NASA ER-2 Campaigns
Chris McLinden
1999-07-22