Next: CPFM-Derived Quantities
Up: The CPFM Spectroradiometer
Previous: The CPFM Spectroradiometer
There are numerous sources of error which contribute to the total
uncertainty. The largest of these is the absolute error, estimated
at 7.0/4.6% (UV/vis).
Errors due to noise can be estimated by examining the differences
in successive spectra. These were found to be less than 1.0/0.5%.
Errors associated with wavelength assignments contribute less than
1%.
There is up to a 15C temperature difference between the
hangar, where the absolute calibration is performed, and the
in-flight temperature of the instrument (controlled at 10C).
As a result, uncertainties of up to 2.5% will be introduced.
The horizontal flux has additional error sources which arise
due to the cosine-correction and the required navigational information
(relative zenith angle and change in azimuth between the sun and the
direction of view). The cosine error is estimated at 2.0/3.0%
and the navigational error at 5.0%.
Similarly, the direct-viewing ports have an additional error
of 1.2% from the use of a calibrated diffuser.
The final uncertainty is 9.4/8.0% for absolute irradiance and
7.7/5.6% for absolute radiance. Omitting the
absolute error contribution, the uncertainty in the radiances
become 3.3/3.2%. To estimate the error in degree of linear
polarization only relative errors need be considered. By
propagating these uncertainties through, the error in polarization
is determined from,
|
(5.3) |
Next: CPFM-Derived Quantities
Up: The CPFM Spectroradiometer
Previous: The CPFM Spectroradiometer
Chris McLinden
1999-07-22